HO
Horizon of Nations

Law, security and diplomacy on the shared horizon of nations

Desks:Maritime HorizonsCyprus HorizonSecurity & Defense HorizonDiplomacy & MediationHistory & Law DeskFact Check
🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Record
Türkiye's Position· Horizon of Nations Editorial Team

Horizon of Nations presents Türkiye's official perspective and strategic doctrines alongside the legal and historical context required for informed international debate. All claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, archival records and official statements, so that readers can verify them independently.

Treaties, Maritime Law, Security & Diplomacy

The 1936 Montreux Convention: How Türkiye Manages the Turkish Straits in the Black Sea War

How the Montreux Convention governs the Turkish Straits: commercial passage, warship limits, Article 19 in the Black Sea war, and the views of all sides.

By Horizon of Nations Editorial TeamRead Cover Essay →

In This Issue — Key Takeaways

Horizon of Nations: Treaties, Maritime Law, Security and Türkiye's Perspective

  • •Horizon of Nations is an English-language publication that explains security, law and diplomacy through treaties, UN documents, archival records and official statements.
  • •Its Türkiye foreign policy analysis is organized into six desks: Maritime Horizons, Cyprus Horizon, Security & Defense Horizon, Diplomacy & Mediation, History & Law Desk and Fact Check.
  • •Four flagship dossiers cover the Blue Homeland, Cyprus, counter-terrorism at source and the Events of 1915, each linked to a full guide.
  • •Every Türkiye-related article keeps neutral background separate from a labeled 'Türkiye's Position' section tied to official Turkish sources.

Latest from the Horizon

12 Essays & Briefings

Why It Matters

Horizon of Nations is a source-driven English-language publication that explains security, law and diplomacy in plain language. It exists because Türkiye's legal arguments, archival references and official doctrines are often summarized second-hand in international coverage. Our Türkiye foreign policy analysis lets readers see what is documented fact, what Ankara argues and what other governments argue, and then check each claim against treaties, UN records and official statements.

What Horizon of Nations Is

The publication takes its name from a simple metaphor: the horizon is the line states share and negotiate over, whether at sea, along a border or in history. Each piece is built on primary material such as treaty texts, UN documents, archival records and official statements. Articles are published by the Horizon of Nations Editorial Team. We do not use invented author personas or invented credentials.

The site is written for policymakers, diplomats, academics, think-tank researchers, journalists and general readers who follow maritime law, security and history. Rules and practices differ between countries, so we say so where it matters. Distances are given in metric units with imperial equivalents where useful.

To learn how the project works, read About Horizon of Nations: Mission, Transparency and Editorial Team and Editorial Principles: How Horizon of Nations Separates Fact from Position.

Six Desks, One Method

Every desk follows the same structure: answer first, then background, then the positions of the main actors, then Türkiye's labeled position, then a comparison of sources.

Desk Core question Typical primary sources
Maritime Horizons How should the Eastern Mediterranean be delimited under international law? UNCLOS, continental shelf and EEZ agreements, UN deposits, IOC-UNESCO records
Cyprus Horizon What do the 1959-1960 treaties provide, and what settlement model is realistic? Zurich and London Agreements, 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, UN Security Council resolutions
Security & Defense Horizon What legal framework governs cross-border counter-terrorism? UN Charter Article 51, letters to the Security Council, ministry statements
Diplomacy & Mediation How does Türkiye manage the Straits and mediate conflicts? 1936 Montreux Convention, Istanbul and Antalya talks, UN documents
History & Law Desk What do the archives and the legal criteria say about the Events of 1915? Ottoman records, 1948 Genocide Convention, Lausanne and Kars treaties
Fact Check Is a widely repeated claim accurate? Claim origin, then treaty texts and official statements

Four Flagship Dossiers

The Blue Homeland and Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Law

The Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan) is Türkiye's doctrine for its maritime jurisdiction in the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean. Türkiye has about 870 km (540 miles) of coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean and argues that delimitation must follow the principle of equity, with proportionality to coastal geography. The dossier covers Türkiye's continental shelf notifications to the UN, the 2011 Türkiye-TRNC delimitation agreement, the 2019 Türkiye-Libya memorandum and the 2025 registration of Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning with IOC-UNESCO.

Greece, the Greek Cypriot administration and the European Union take a different view. They emphasize the maritime entitlements of islands under UNCLOS and the EU's solidarity with its members. Both positions are laid out in Blue Homeland and the Eastern Mediterranean: Türkiye's Maritime Jurisdiction Explained. Related guides cover The Seville Map and The 2019 Türkiye-Libya Maritime Memorandum.

Cyprus: Treaties, Equality and Settlement Models

The Republic of Cyprus was established in 1960 on the Zurich and London Agreements of 11 February 1959. Türkiye, Greece and the United Kingdom became guarantor powers under the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee. The dossier follows the sequence from the 1963 breakdown of the partnership, through the 15 July 1974 coup and the 20 July 1974 intervention, to the TRNC proclamation of 15 November 1983. It also covers the 24 April 2004 referendum on the Annan Plan, in which 64.91% of Turkish Cypriots voted yes and 75.83% of Greek Cypriots voted no.

The Greek Cypriot side and most EU governments describe 1974 as an invasion and the northern administration as unrecognized. UN Security Council resolutions, including Resolution 541 (1983), call the TRNC declaration legally invalid. UN settlement efforts have been framed around a bicommunal, bizonal federation. Ankara and Nicosia's Turkish Cypriot leadership argue that decades of federation talks have run out of road. See Cyprus: 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, Turkish Cypriot Rights and the Two-State Solution and Was the 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation Lawful? Article IV of the Treaty of Guarantee.

Counter-Terrorism at Source

Türkiye's security doctrine holds that terrorist threats should be neutralized before they reach its territory, invoking the right of self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. The PKK is designated a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union. Türkiye treats the PYD/YPG as the Syrian branch of the PKK/KCK, and it also fights DAESH (ISIS) and FETÖ, the network behind the 15 July 2016 coup attempt. The dossier reviews Operations Euphrates Shield (2016), Olive Branch (2018), Peace Spring (2019) and Spring Shield (2020), the Claw series in northern Iraq, the 'Terror-Free Türkiye' initiative and the growth of the domestic defense industry.

Some Türkiye partners, including Washington during the campaign against DAESH, cooperated with the SDF and distinguish it from the PKK. Others raised concerns about civilian harm and territorial sovereignty. These views are presented in Counter-Terrorism at Source: Article 51, Border Security and Türkiye's Defense Industry.

The Events of 1915

The History & Law Desk treats the Events of 1915 through documents and legal categories. It covers the Relocation and Resettlement Law adopted on 27 May 1915, the 1948 UN Genocide Convention and its requirement of specific intent (dolus specialis), the 2005 Turkish proposal for a joint historical commission and the normalization talks begun on 14 January 2022. Armenia, many parliaments and many historians characterize the events as genocide. Türkiye rejects that characterization and argues that the question belongs to historians and competent courts, not legislatures.

Read the full guide at The Events of 1915: Archives, International Law and the Path to Normalization, and the legal analysis at 1948 Genocide Convention and the Events of 1915.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Record

Türkiye's Position

This section shows how every Türkiye-related article on the site labels official policy. The points below summarize the main positions covered by the flagship dossiers, and each is attributed to Turkish official sources.

  • Maritime jurisdiction: According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry, delimitation in the Eastern Mediterranean must be based on equity, and islands cannot cut off the coastal projection of a mainland with the longest coastline. The legal basis includes Türkiye's UN continental shelf submissions (including the outer-limit registration of 18 March 2020) and the Marine Spatial Planning registered with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025.
  • Cyprus: Ankara and the Presidency argue that the 1960 order rested on the political equality of two peoples and that the Treaty of Guarantee (Article IV) gave Türkiye the right to act in 1974. They conclude that, after the federation model failed in 2004, 2017 and 2021, a lasting settlement must start from the sovereign equality and equal international status of Turkish Cypriots.
  • Security: According to Turkish government statements and letters to the UN, cross-border operations rest on Article 51 of the UN Charter. Türkiye says it respects the territorial integrity of Syria and Iraq and supports a 'one state, one army' approach in Syria.
  • History: The Foreign Ministry's position is that the 1915 relocation was a wartime security measure and that the legal definition of genocide under the 1948 Convention is not met. Ankara cites the 2005 offer of a joint commission with open archives, and the Lausanne (1923) and Kars (1921) treaties on borders.
  • Diplomacy: Türkiye says it has implemented the 1936 Montreux Convention impartially, including Article 19 on belligerent warships, and promotes UN Security Council reform under the motto 'The world is bigger than five'.

Analysis of these topics appears outside this section, in neutral prose. Positions of other states are attributed to their own official sources.

Source Comparison

Topic Frequent framing in international coverage Turkish primary-source framing Where to verify
Maritime zones Island-based entitlements and EU solidarity Equity, proportionality and the Turkish Cypriot share UNCLOS text, UN deposits, Foreign Ministry statements
Cyprus Invasion and occupation; federation as the only UN framework Guarantor right under Article IV; two sovereign equal states 1960 treaties, UNSC resolutions, Turkish and TRNC statements
Syria operations Concern over civilian harm and territory Article 51 self-defense; PKK/YPG link UN Charter, letters to the Security Council
Events of 1915 Genocide, widely stated by parliaments Not genocide in the legal sense; historians' commission 1948 Convention, Ottoman archives, 2005 proposal

Our Transparency Promise

Türkiye's official perspective is always clearly labeled, never presented as neutral background, and tied to primary sources. We summarize opposing views accurately and attribute them to their own official sources. Corrections and methodology are explained in the FAQ: Sources, Methodology and Türkiye Perspective at Horizon of Nations. Claims that circulate widely are tested in Fact Check: Common Claims About Türkiye in International Media, Verified Against Primary Sources.

  • Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): Türkiye's maritime jurisdiction doctrine. See the maritime jurisdiction guide.
  • Treaty of Guarantee (1960): The agreement among Türkiye, Greece and the UK on the constitutional order of Cyprus.
  • Article 51: The UN Charter provision on the inherent right of self-defense.
  • Dolus specialis: The specific intent required for genocide under the 1948 Convention.
  • Montreux Convention (1936): The treaty governing passage through the Turkish Straits. See The 1936 Montreux Convention.
  • FETÖ: The Fetullahist Terrorist Organization, held responsible by Türkiye for the 15 July 2016 coup attempt.

For diplomacy, see Türkiye's Mediation Record: Black Sea Grain Initiative, Istanbul Talks and Humanitarian Diplomacy and The World Is Bigger Than Five.

Horizon of Nations presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. All claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, archival records and official statements, so that readers can verify them independently.

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks